Powell River scorecard

Powell River · the term in context

Higher costs.Important work unfinished.

Public records show what households carried, what City Hall delivered and what remains for the next Council.

01 · Household pressure and City finances

What residents paid. Where City money went.

Start with the household impact, then follow the audited ledger.

Municipal property tax

Four years of increases

34.5%compounded

Change in the municipal property tax on Powell River’s average single-family home, 2023–2026.

20234.3%
20247.2%
202511.2%
20268.15%
Sources & calculation

The four annual municipal-property-tax changes are compounded, not added. Utilities and levies from other taxing authorities are outside this measure. The 2023–2026 increases compound to 34.47%. The 2026 figure is the adopted municipal-tax increase, not a forecast.

2026 representative-home comparison

The complete annual bill

One provincial measure, sorted low to high. Each bar combines municipal tax and standard charges, regional levies, and school and agency taxes. Each community uses its own representative home, providing broad context for the household burden in each place.

Municipal + chargesRegional + hospitalSchool + agencies
Full table & official method

Schedule 704 uses each community’s own representative single-family assessment. It compares a typical house in each place, and the dollar value of those homes differs. Totals are before the Home Owner Grant. Service configurations still differ between municipalities.

The $5,639 figure shown inside the audited-finance chart is a separate 2025 local model using Powell River's $585,038 average residential assessment. This chart uses the Province's 2026 representative-home method and a $601,408 Powell River home. Both include municipal charges, regional levies, school and agency taxes and are shown before the Home Owner Grant. Because the year and assessment basis differ, $5,639 and $6,111 are not a measured one-year increase.

Twelve communities ranked by total 2026 taxes and standard charges on a representative house
CommunityRepresentative homeMunicipal + chargesRegional + hospitalSchool + agenciesTotal
01Terrace$516,428$3,072$493$1,202$4,767
02Port Alberni$506,292$4,268$280$792$5,340
03Prince Rupert$445,774$4,291$299$957$5,547
04Cumberland$799,241$3,911$828$1,310$6,049
05Campbell River$721,718$4,048$931$1,106$6,085
06Powell River$601,408$4,406$707$998$6,111
07Courtenay$782,777$4,221$795$1,099$6,115
08Comox$900,027$3,986$872$1,263$6,121
09Nelson$720,344$4,084$1,061$1,260$6,405
10Parksville$823,746$3,812$1,541$1,097$6,450
11Sechelt$968,782$4,410$1,159$1,865$7,434
12Squamish$1,553,742$6,151$342$1,637$8,130

Twelve communities · ranked low to high

Four-year property-tax change

Published nominal increases · compounded 2023–2026

Select a community to see the pressures behind its number.

0120.2%
0228.7%
0328.9%
0429.8%
0531.8%
0632.9%
0733.6%
0834.5%
0936.0%
1036.3%
1140.3%
1244.1%
Method & official sources

“City comparator” identifies the ten municipalities selected in a 2024 Powell River staff comparison; “nearby” identifies Cumberland and the three geographically close members of that set.

Published annual headline measures are compounded, not added. The inflation-adjusted view divides each four-year change by the 11.47% increase in British Columbia’s all-items CPI from June 2022 to June 2026 (146.5 to 163.3). This measures change above consumer inflation; CPI is not a municipal cost index.

This is a directional comparison of each municipality’s own published annual municipal property-tax headline. Local measures vary: some describe a representative home and others describe the approved levy or tax-revenue change. It excludes utilities, parcel taxes and other taxing authorities. Comox’s separately reported Infrastructure Renewal Fund levy is also excluded. The chart does not compare total bills, service levels or the same house across communities.

The locator uses Statistics Canada's 2021 cartographic boundary for British Columbia. Each point is derived from the largest land polygon in that community's matching census-subdivision boundary; it is an orientation aid, not a municipal-boundary map.

2025 audited city finances

Where the money went and how each line changed.

The 2025 total shows the whole ledger. Hover, focus or tap any category to see its audited four-year trend.

Hover, focus or tap any category to see its four-year audited trend.

City of Powell River 2025 audited revenue and expense flow with four-year category trendsFifty-four point two million dollars of audited 2025 revenue flows through one pooled City total to operating and debt expenses by service category and a pre-disposal surplus. Each revenue and expense category can be focused to reveal audited actuals for 2022 through 2025.Revenue · $54.2MExpenses & surplus · $54.2MTotal Budget$54.2MRevenue is pooled2025 modelled full annual home bill$5,639On $585,038 assessment · $4,869 after basic grantCity of Powell River$3,975tax $2,837 + utilities $1,138Regional levies$744qRD $542 + qRHD $202School & agencies$920school $899 + BCAA/MFA $21

2025 modelled full annual home bill

$5,639On a $585,038 assessment
$4,869 after the basic grant
City of Powell River$3,975Tax $2,837 + utilities $1,138Regional levies$744qRD $542 + qRHD $202School & agencies$920School $899 + BCAA/MFA $21

Revenue $54.2M

Expenses & surplus $54.2M

Notes & sources

Consolidated audited actuals, rounded to $0.1 million. Revenues are pooled, so the chart does not claim that one source funds a particular service. Expenses include amortization and debt charges. The $5.2 million pre-disposal surplus supports capital, reserves and future obligations; it is not spare cash. The household model uses the $585,038 average residential assessment on the 2025 revised roll and the City's published 80-foot average frontage for a single-family home. The $5,639 total is the full annual notice before the Home Owner Grant: City general and flat taxes; qRD and qRHD levies; school, BCAA and MFA taxes; water, sewer-user and sewer-frontage charges; and standard curbside waste service. An eligible principal-residence owner receiving the 2025 basic $770 grant would pay approximately $4,869. Optional services, penalties and property-specific adjustments are excluded. Individual bills vary, and assessed value is not an average sale price. The category trend cards use audited 2022–2025 actuals on a consistent pre-disposal basis. The 2022 column uses the City's 2023 restated comparative, and the 2024 column uses the re-presented 2025 comparative. Asset-disposal gains and losses were removed from earlier other-revenue, water, sewer and surplus figures so those four trend cards match the 2025 presentation.

02 · Delivery and continuity

What remained unfinished.

The clearest test is the City's own record of priorities, plans and leadership continuity.

October 2025 progress report

3

Priorities reported “No progress.”

  • Housing authority
  • Advance toward zero waste
  • Small-business attraction and retention plan

Official Community Plan

2027

The full community-plan update moved beyond the term.

The October 2025 update said the work was paused until Q1 2027.

Leadership continuity

6

People served in the CAO chair.

Including interim appointments, from November 2022 through July 2025.

Non-unionized severance agreements

Roles, reasons and total cost were not disclosed.
2022
0
2023
2
2024
2
2025
2
Definitions & official sources

The priority statuses are a dated October 2025 snapshot, not a claim that no work followed. “Six people served in the CAO chair” includes interim and permanent appointments; Council inherited an interim arrangement. It is a leadership-continuity measure, not an organization-wide turnover rate. Severance disclosures report agreements only and do not identify the employees or establish why employment ended.

03 · Service pressure

What essential services carried.

Calls for service show police workload and unfinished demand.

RCMP calls for service

Calls eased in 2025. Even after that decline, regional files were 10.1% above 2018 and City files were 12.6% higher. Calls measure police workload, not crime.

2024 → 2025 · entire region−5.5%6,700 calls eased to 6,333

One region-wide measure

Calendar years · City share shown inside each total
Within CityOutside City
2018
5,750 region4,402 City
2019
6,501 region5,063 City
2020
6,079 region4,540 City
2021
6,716 region5,092 City
2022
6,114 region4,701 City
2023
6,443 region4,874 City
2024
6,700 region5,168 City
2025
6,333 region4,956 City

2018 → 2025: regional files +10.1%·City files +12.6%

Why it matters

Demand absorbs the capacity residents pay for.

Sustained workload can leave less time for proactive patrols, follow-up and prevention, while adding pressure to staffing and budgets.

What remains unfinished

Mental-health calls rose sharply in the latest City fiscal year.

These are RCMP files involving intervention under B.C.’s Mental Health Act, often including crisis de-escalation, apprehension or transport for medical assessment. They use City-funded officer time for response, hospital hand-off, reporting and follow-up; some also involve fire, bylaw or outreach. Health care itself is provincial. rose 32.5% from 117 to 155, while total City calls rose 1.1%. Police, health, housing operators, bylaw and outreach still need shared measures showing whether repeat demand is falling.

Notes & sources

The regional total covers the Powell River–Texada Island RCMP detachment. “Outside City” is the report’s Regional District-only series; the City figure is the regional total less that published amount. All eight bars use calendar years and one common scale. The 2018–2020 figures come from the RCMP’s earlier annual presentations; the 2021–2025 figures come from its latest matched five-year tables. Calls measure police workload, not unique people, crime severity or proof of any one cause. For context, the separate completed City fiscal comparison recorded 5,064 calls followed by 5,118, including 117 and 155 Mental Health Act calls. Those figures remain separate from the chart.

The record is clear enough to learn from.

I believe the next Council can bring steadier leadership, sharper priorities and disciplined follow-through.